D1
Internal coherence and valid inference
Under the school’s own best formulation, do its load-bearing claims stay consistent, and are the inferences it needs actually valid?
The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.
Open questions that would help mark this
- OTC-008Which Trinitarian model is coherent, and at what cost?
D1’s scoring question is mutual consistency of the school’s own models. This contention is the ledger’s coherence-and-cost inventory of Trinitarian models.
- OTC-002Why exactly three divine persons?
D1 is capped at 2 when the defence is a possibility/coherence project — the rubric names the OTC-002 Sijuwade findings as that pattern.
- OTC-021What does “3 is one number” actually show?
D1 asks whether an inference is valid. “3 is one number” is on file as a coherence illustration, not a proof of three persons.