Worklist · not a ranking

The unfinished sheet

Debby marks worldviews on ten subjects — the same ten, same standard, for every school. This page is the blank exam book: which papers are still unmarked, and which open questions would help mark them. It is not a league table. Completing a cell does not mint a rank.

How to read the marks

  • Unmarked (W). The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.
  • We lack sources (NE). Debby does not yet hold the minimum sources to score a named school here. That is a fact about the library, not about the school.
  • Marked 0–4. A human has written a number under the frozen anchors. Filling a cell is still not a rank. Gate A still sits between a submission and a number.

Today 10 of 10 subjects on the unfinished sheet are unmarked. Almost everything is still W, because a human has not yet adjudicated the underlying questions under the frozen rubric. The sheet above has no 0–4.

Global school ranks are forbidden for now. Named-set comparisons only — and none of those clear the floor while the sheet looks like this. The instrument is on the rubric page.

Jump to a subject

  1. D1
  2. D2
  3. D3
  4. D4
  5. D5
  6. D6
  7. D7
  8. D8
  9. D9
  10. D10
  11. Named sittings

D1

Internal coherence and valid inference

Unmarked · W

Under the school’s own best formulation, do its load-bearing claims stay consistent, and are the inferences it needs actually valid?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D2

Explanatory scope and depth

Unmarked · W

How much of the fixed list does the account actually address — and does it explain by a stated mechanism, not by relabelling?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D3

Ontological and epistemic adequacy

Unmarked · W

Does the school name both something in reality that makes the claims true, and a way a knower could reach it — and do those two answers fit?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D4

Non-ad-hocness and parsimony

Unmarked · W

Are extra posits motivated independently of the problem they now solve? Simplicity never adds points by itself.

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D5

Public historical, empirical, and textual fit

Unmarked · W

Where the school makes dated, textual, or institutional claims, how do those fare against the discipline’s own evidentiary standards?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D6

Error-correction and epistemic access

Unmarked · W

Does the school give a sincere adherent a way to detect and correct an error in its own account — and has that way ever actually operated?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D7

Unity, persons, oughts, meaning, lived experience

Unmarked · W

Does the account actually reach these five phenomena, each judged on its own — not by offering kinds of thing as if they were a headcount?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D8

Performance against the strongest objection

Unmarked · W

Against the strongest objection located under a documented search, has the school replied to the actual load-bearing step?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D9

Source quality and fair representation

Unmarked · W

Above the eligibility gate: are the sources independent of one another, and is the school being represented as it represents itself?

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

D10

Defensibility of the stopping point

Unmarked · W

Every worldview stops somewhere. This subject does not score having a stopping point. It scores how defensible the one the school actually holds is.

The paper is still in the marker’s inbox. Human adjudication under the frozen rubric has not happened. This is not a zero.

Open questions that would help mark this

Research sittings · not ranks

Named sittings (not ranks)

Two research sittings tried the ten-subject ruler on two named sets — not on “worldviews as a league table.” Every blank is shown. A number here is a proposal: AI_PROPOSED unless tagged HUMAN_REVIEWED from the 2026-08-18 cluster. A later same-day pass filled more Set A blanks as proposals. The count floor can be met on paper without becoming a named-set result: there is still no average and no order.

These tables do not mark the unfinished sheet above. They do not say Eastern Orthodoxy is ranked first. Warrants live in the private research sitting, not on this page.

Eastern Orthodoxy vs Māturīdī

Scored EO 8 of 10 · Māturīdī 8 of 10 · overlap 8. Comparable? NO. Count floor met as unadjudicated proposals only. No average. No named-set order. Not a worldview rank. Not Islam-global.

Eastern Orthodoxy vs Māturīdī marks, including withheld and not eligible cells
SubjectEOMāturīdī
D12AI_PROPOSED2HUMAN_REVIEWED
D22AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D32AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D42AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D5NENE
D62AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D7NENE
D82HUMAN_REVIEWED2HUMAN_REVIEWED
D92AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D102HUMAN_REVIEWED2HUMAN_REVIEWED

Eastern Orthodoxy vs Sher vs Maddy

Scored Each column 5 of 10 · overlap 5. Comparable? NO. Not yet comparable. D1 is unmarked for every column. Sher and Maddy are not the same rival.

Eastern Orthodoxy vs Sher vs Maddy marks, including withheld and not eligible cells
SubjectEOSherMaddy
D1WWW
D22AI_PROPOSED3AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D32AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D4WWW
D5NENENE
D62AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D7NENENE
D82AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED
D9WWW
D102AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED2AI_PROPOSED

Help complete this

A source, a steelman, or a leftover we missed is proposed evidence, not a score. Nothing you send writes a 0–4 or a rank. A human still has to accept it before a cell can be marked.

You can also attach a URL on any open-question page. Same rule: it stages a suggestion. It does not mint a number.