Systemic worldview discrimination
Whether a named school survives better than rivals across a bounded, preregistered inventory of burdens, using the existing comparative dimensions and source gates. A local overlap or borrowed argument is not this test, and this test is not a second score.
Systemic worldview discrimination asks whether a named school survives better than rivals across a bounded, preregistered burden inventory, using the existing OTR dimensions, source gates, and human Gate A. It is a diagnostic beneath those dimensions, not a replacement rubric and not a second score.
A local overlap — a rival borrowing one argument — is not this test. An unrelated systemic failure does not reach back and make a local entailment valid. Eastern Orthodoxy succeeding at the inventory does not repair an invalid local EO inference.
The mistaken everyday reading is "we scored the worldviews." No valid aggregate exists before human freeze. The inventory shows what has actually been tested.
Where this comes up
Sources
- research/perfect-divine-love-eternal-other-and-whole-worldview-parity-audit-2026-08-17.md §8